Filed under: 2008 Offseason | Tags: 49ers offseason, chad johnson, chad johnson to the 49ers
Chad Johnson recently came out and demanded he be traded from the Bengals, and immediate speculation ensued among 49er fans, who long for the days of top-flight recievers in San Francisco. Could the 49ers acquire Johnson? What could the 49ers have that the Bengals would want?
Chad the Distraction
I am as close to Cincinnati as I am to Indianapolis, and I see a lot of Chad Johnson. He is nowhere close to the kind of locker room problems of, say, Terrell Owens, Randy Moss, or even Antonio Bryant. What Chad is reacting to is the complacency of the Bengals ownership group. For years their only concern has been selling tickets, not buliding a consistent winner. Where 49er fans are accustomed to Hall of Famers and Super Bowls, Cincinnati fans are accustomed to losing. The owners know they are going to sell tickets whether the team wins or loses.
Chad Johnson has done nothing but perform consistently on the field. He is a fabulous possession reciever, as his primary contribution is catches and yards. The TD celebrations are the only thing that really puts him in the public eye, but it’s entertainment. He doesn’t score touchdowns all that often. The media ALWAYS overhypes players like this, to make you believe all they do is whine. Chad merely recognizes that win or lose, Marvin Lewis will have his job for as long as he wants it, and Chad will continue to labor without a real shot at a Super Bowl.
If I had to qualify him as a distraction, I would say he’s more like Deion Sanders. Yes, he is flamboyant for the sake of entertainment, but when he’s on the field he is nothing less than a Pro Bowler, and he gets along with fellow players. Don’t talk to me about this “rift” between him and Carson Palmer. Carson is asserting himself as the leader of this team, but also making assumptions. Johnson didn’t want anyone putting words in his mouth. They’ve been playing together for years now with nothing to show for it, and Chad wants something to play for.
What Would the 49ers Trade?
First up is pick #29 in this year’s draft. This is an absolute no-brainer. There are no players in this year’s class that are good enough that we can’t pass them up. There are solid Outside Linebackers valued in Round Two (Avril). There are solid Offensive Linemen valued in Round Three (McGlynn).
But Cincinnati won’t part for just #29. Chad is worth more than that. Who would we trade to them? I imagine that they covet Defensive Line depth, and everyone knows they absolutely need a Defensive Linemen in this draft. We happen to have several young, capable players in that area. I could see us unloading #29 and perhaps Melvin Oliver or Joe Cohen.
Would they take a trade for that? Sure. They have #9, they’d have #29, and they’d have a good young DT. That’s three first-day values right there.
What About the Financials for the 49ers?
I’ll relay a conversation I had with my good friend and Cincinnati Bengals fan, Kevin Willis. He’s also my cohost on The Fanboy Sportscast, still on hiatus.
Me: Well admittedly I’d love to see Chad in a 49er uniform. However, we’ve only got 18 mil of cap space, and if we brought Chad in we’d have to let someone else go. I know Scot McCloughan and the Yorks are not about to take a down-the-road cap hit for the guy. However, it is possible (however unlikely) that Chad would agree to a less than market value contract for a chance to play with Martz and have a couple years of great numbers to boost said value.
Kevin: He makes about six million. You’d be giving up the #1 pick, so that leaves you $12 million to sign picks 2-7. Should be plenty.
Me: But I’m considering the typical contract ballooning in the latter years.
Kevin: It doesn’t balloon. We eat the signing bonus. It is a good deal.
Me: How does it not balloon? Cincinnati eats the signing bonus?
Kevin: The team that paid the signing bonus eats it. It goes against our cap. You just pay his salary. You can cut him whenever you want without fear of the signing bonus accelerating against your cap. It accelerates a little, but nothing major. It stays in the $6 mil range.
Me: What’s the remaining term of his contract?
Kevin: Four years I think. Don’t quote me.
Me: I just did.
So here’s the skinny: Chad’s got four years left on his contract ( I looked it up, he was right). This keeps him in San Francisco. His signing bonus counts against Cincinnati’s cap, and we can cut him whenever we want. He comes in, we tell him to cheer up and behave, and have Mike Martz use him to his full potential. I think this would be an outstanding move for us, and we can still address our O-Line and Pass Rusher needs in the draft.
9 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Indy – I for one would love CJ, but the truth of the matter is, he wants money…and yes a superbowl, so not sure how we fair in either
Comment by cbass April 17, 2008 @ 10:07 amWELL I THINK WE PAID NATE CLEMENTS 80 MIL OVER 8 YRS AND IT DIDNT KILL US ON SALARY CAP BECAUSE FOR THE WAY IT WAS BLED OUT THROUGHOUT THE 8 YEARS I BELIEVE WE COULD DO THE SAME WITH HIM…. SO I DO NOT BELIEVE THE MONEY IS GOING TO BE THE DEAL BUSTER IT WILL BE THE SUPERBOWL WHICH WE ARE BUILDING A GREAT YOUNG TEAM THAT WELL BE VERY COMPETITIVE IN THE COMING YEARS
Comment by Jarrod April 17, 2008 @ 11:14 amPerhaps I did not emphasize the point that Chad has four years left, so his contract comes pre-made for four seasons. We don’t have to worry about a new deal for four years. He signed a six-year $35 mil deal, which is chump change for a Pro Bowler of his caliber.
Comment by indianajim April 17, 2008 @ 11:22 amThis would actually be a ridiculously good move.
That being agreed upon, the chances of the Niners doing it are ridiculously low.
To be completely honest, package him up with another wide out. Arnaz maybe, he’d be a good compliment to Housh, and I don’t think I’ve ever heard of him complaining.
I know everyone will think I’m nuts, seeing as he’s been our most consitant rec for a few years, but chad would be an upgrade, and it would be worth it.
Comment by DC9er April 17, 2008 @ 12:28 pmif the niners did trade the first for CJ, they still need D-line and O-line help, which position do you pick. I’d hate to see them pick O-line, but with the D-line, unless the guy’s gonna be 300+ lbs, I’d say it’s worthless.
Comment by DC9er April 17, 2008 @ 12:43 pmno way chad comes over and doesn’t want to restructure his contract. that could become a problem. i would love to see it happen though
Comment by Go Cougs April 17, 2008 @ 2:09 pmDC9er I agree it likely would not happen, but it’s a heck of a “supplement” if they do. I don’t believe D-line is as high a priority as weakside linebacker. We just got Smith, we moved Sopoaga, and Ronald Fields played admirably against the run.
When they run a 4 down linemen scenario, I see Sopoaga moving inside and McDonald playing the strong side end. McDonald really showed a lot of burst and athleticism last season, and just a rookie. I really think he’s going to come on this year.
Go Cougs, I totally agree that Chad would want to restructure the contract, the question is when? I see him going for two years and then aiming for a restructuring. With the way Paraag “Mad Indian” Marathe works those contracts, I think we could do it. Remember McNolan’s penchant for building through the draft. It keeps your cap numbers low, and they’re very good at structuring deals. The question becomes how well Chad represents the 49ers organization. Does he “become” the 49ers, or does he simply use it as a launching point? I think they will improve on the young Wideouts they bring in, and after two years I could see us parting ways with Johnson and not experience a huge dropoff.
Comment by indianajim April 17, 2008 @ 2:22 pmOcho want 3 things, money, winning a SB and attention. IF the trade was made, he’ll start squawking about an extension and a raise. He’ll get plenty of attention as the 9ers #1, but instead of Carson Palmer throwing to him, he’ll have Smith and Hill…even with Martz, I doubt he wants to go to a team that has our QB situation. Don’t get me started on the chances of winning a SB next year
Comment by Lott4Prez April 18, 2008 @ 12:30 amVery nice!!
Comment by nenontoniure August 3, 2008 @ 7:03 am