please visit http://www.49ersfancast.com


Moving Forward: The Offense

It’s been a long time since I’ve posted an entry here, and likely many of you expected the third in the Going Forward installment by sometime in January.

I wanted to wait until the 49ers Offensive personnel got closer to sorting itself out before I decided my opinion.  I waited until Mike Martz was hired.  I waited through Free Agency.  I waited until the Offseason Conditioning Program began to see who would show up for work.  Now I have an idea as to how things are going to shake out.

Clearly, Mike Martz is going to be the difference maker this season.  The leaps and bounds of progress that Norv Turner made with Alex Smith, Frank Gore, Arnaz Battle, and even the offensive line, was cut short under Jim Hostler.  He was just a very bad coach, make no bones about it.  However, Mike Martz is much more of a catalyst for change than even Norv Turner is.  Norv can take a bad situation and make it better.  Mike Martz can take garbage and make it sing opera.

The simple fact is that everything Mike Martz touches turns to gold.  Trent Green, Kurt Warner, Marc Bulger, and even John Kitna are all testaments to that fact.  Even Marshall Faulk, the guy people say Martz forgot how to use, was twice a league MVP because of him.  Martz has been to two Super Bowls and achieved victory in one of them.  Losing a close one to Tom Brady is no sob story.

The Marshall Faulk tale brings up the conundrum that all critics like to preach, that Martz does not know how to run the football.  Look at the facts:  Mike Martz has been the Offensive playcaller for how many teams?  Two.  He made a name for himself in St. Louis with speedy guys like Torry Holt and Az-Zahir Hakim, but he also had Isaac Bruce (now a Niner) and Ricky Proehl as his possession receivers.  Everyone says Martz’ system needs small, fast recievers to work.  In Detroit, he had big ol’ bookend receivers.

When Martz came in, Faulk achieved the Roger Craig-like 1,000 yards rushing and 1,000 yards receiving.  Faulk was already in his sixth year in the league, and it wasn’t until year nine that his numbers began to drop off.  Martz could see his durability sloping off, so it’s no small wonder that Faulk appeared to be used less and less.  People say Martz doesn’t know how to run the ball, and sometimes his stubbornness comes out in public, especially when he says he should have thrown the ball more against the Patriots. 

The reason teams want to run the ball is twofold: first, to control the clock and keep the ball out of the other teams’ hands.  The second reason is to wear down opposing defenses by grinding it out.  Marshall Faulk’s own words on the subject make the most sense.  He admitted that Frank Gore is a much better inside runner than he ever was.  Faulk was better suited to the cutback trap plays that moved the back to the outside edges.  This does not serve to wear down defenses, as the defensive linemen give pursuit for as much as three seconds before the play moves beyond them.  There is no chance to wear them down.

Conversely with a tank like Frank Gore, which Martz never had, and our beefy offensive linemen, which Martz never had, we can push the ball inside.  The Defensive Linemen will more often be forced to use their upper body for positioning and tackling, and linebackers will be filling gaps inside, getting pounded by linemen and Gore himself.  This is the key to a second half running game.

Martz is not a man who is a slave to his own system.  He used the weapons he had in St. Louis, and he used the weapons he had in Detroit.  He never came in and forced the team to pick the players he wanted to “fit his system.”  Mike Martz is a master of football, period.  He knows how to use players to fit their skill sets.  He never had a bruising back.   He never had a mobile quarterback.  He never had a freakishly talented, though still a little raw, mold-breaking tight end.  His offensive line in St. Louis was good, while the one in Detroit was not.  He had garbage running backs while we have an All-Pro. 

By the way, Martz is the guy that drafted Stephen Jackson.  Okay, moving on.

Speaking of mobile quarterbacks, this leads me to another gripe the critics will espouse.  They tell me to look at the sack nubmers, that Martz “gets quarterbacks killed.”  However, we need to look at sack numbers for his quarterbacks without his “system.”  Kurt Warner was a notorious sack magnet and fumbler in New York, and plays only slightly better in Arizona since they actually have receivers who can catch the ball.  Marc Bulger got utterly destroyed last year, and not just because Orlando Pace was out.  Trent Green has been forced to retire because of all the blows to the head, and John Kitna has zero escapability.

Essentially this means that Alex Smith, who has shown us his escapability in games all through 2006, and the three games in which he was not injured in 2007, gives Martz a tool he has never had: the threat of the quarterback to run.  Martz can now actually use a rollout pass play, whereas no defense would ever be fooled by a Kurt Warner bootleg.  Martz can now actually use a rolling pocket screen play.  Big whoop you say, but for a guy like Martz this is like a new chemistry set at Christmas, and his dad just told him to make something. 

Mike Martz is the most important factor to the 49ers’ success this season.  After that, Bryant Johnson is a legitimate threat to be the Primary receiver if he displays a strong work ethic .  Arnaz Battle is still good enough to be a consistent player, he just had a subpar performance last season.  Isaac Bruce provides leadership and a great possession reciever when on the field.  What he provides to his fellow players is a model of how to work with Coach Martz, especially to a group that was woeful last season.

In other news of woeful groups, J.T. O’Sullivan is not a guy that is brought in to compete as the starter, let’s just get that out in the open.  Martz may say so, but he doesn’t want to piss off O’Sullivan’s agent.  Mike Nolan is under no such constraints, and made that clear on NFL Network.  What O’Sullivan provides is another model of how to work with Mike Martz.  If Smith or Hill become uncomfortable, all they need to do is look at the younger O’Sullivan and say, “if he can do it, we can do it.”

Let’s be honest.  Shaun Hill has been in the leage going on seven years.  The 49ers brought him in almost as an afterthought.  You can go back to the post “Much Ado About Shaun Hill” to find out why his end of the year performance last season was unimpressive.  The simple fact is, if you’re an afterthought in your sixth season in the NFL, you are not starter or potential starter material.  Alex Smith is about to begin only his third season of real playing time.  He only has 30 starts under his belt under three different coordinators.  His career is far from decided.

Mike Martz is indeed the best thing Mike Nolan could have given Smith.  Oh yeah, and some receivers to boot.  We’ve seen what Smith could do with Antonio Bryant.  Now put Isaac Bruce and Bryant Johnson into the mix, and a healthy Vernon Davis who had a fine season for a tight end last year.  Things are looking way up for Alex Smith.  Martz and Smith are going to do outstanding things, in my opinion.

Here’s the bottom line:  Whether Smith, Hill, or O’Sullivan, the choice of starter will be the right choice, and they will put up great numbers.  No matter how you slice it, with Mike Martz, this team will be in the playoffs.  Mark it.


11 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I agree that Alex will likely be the starter and have a decent to good 2008 under Martz. A much larger question mark is Vernon Davis. He is a marvellously gifted athlete from the neck down, but unfortunately is not the brightest star in the firmament. Throw in a little immaturity and arrogance and you have a very difficult, but not necessarily impossible coaching challenge. Bill Walsh understood the importance of working with what an athlete CAN DO and not waste effort on trying to coach away what an athlete CANNOT DO. In Vernon’s case, this means three things: 1) shorten his play book; 2) simplify his assignments; and 3) drill, drill, drill what’s left until he can be reasonably sure to execute properly most of the time. The good news is that Vernon only needs to make 5 or 6 big plays a game to increase his production by, say, 50% in 2008 while also drawing attention away from the other receivers and helping them. The bad news possibly is that Martz may not be willing or patient enough to work within Vernon’s limitations. This will be interesting to watch. Beadhead

Comment by Robert Means

Alex Smith is a bust! Mark it.

Comment by Joe Gomez

Wow that’s a good one. Never heard that one before.

Comment by indianajim

what a dam good artical so much information…

i have watched alex for a lond time since living in utah and i know he will turn the corner this season he has so much abilty….. our offense sucked last season because if Jim Hostler that guy better never come around again indiana jim U the man keep these types of articals coming

Comment by ninerfaithful

Thanks, ninerfaithful. I hope I don’t disappoint.

Comment by indianajim

C’mon – you act like Martz was somehow forced to pass the ball that much. The guy had Stephen Jackson AND Marshall Faulk on the roster in STL. In Detroit, Kevin Jones was coming off an injury-shortened sophomore campaign where he had been the focus of every opposing team’s game plan when Matz arrived in Detroit, but he had been a 1,000 yard back his rookie year. In fact, Lions fans used essentially the same argument you are using when Martz got there – namely that he was somehow forced to throw the ball by STL’s roster and he would really open things up for Kevin Jones on the ground in Detroit. How’d that work out for them?

Next, you say he’s not a slave to his system and then act like he was somehow held back by having two big “book end” WR’s in Detroit. So apparently he’s not a slave to his system, he just can’t adapt it to utilize guys like Roy Williams and Charles Johnson? Sounds logical.

Since, 1999 Mike Martz has passed the ball a minimum of 59% of the time. Thats FAR more than the rest of the league. Put any other coordinator in those jobs – would they have done the same thing? Or is it possible Martz just prefers passing the ball?

Martz didn’t work any “magic” on Jon Kitna. Kitna put up those stats based on sheer volume. Plug any QB into an offense that throws that much and you will see their numbers go up. Its not “magic” – its “math”.

As for Bulger and Warner – its true that Warner made MVP under Martz, but he also fell apart under Martz. If the rise is all Martz, than so is the fall. Bulger’s stats were higher under Martz because the overall talent level was higher and because they threw the ball so much. This isn’t rocket science.

If you want to argue that Martz will change his tune in SF, than just argue that. But don’t re-write history to make your case, it doesn’t suit you. I thought you were better than that.

Comment by Steve

I never said that Martz didn’t pass the ball more than he ran the ball. But a 59% to 41% ratio isn’t exactly overboard. It sounds relatively Walsh-like. What he did do as a coordinator and his first two seasons as head coach, was continue to make Marshall Faulk an MVP-like player.

In 2004, Jackson’s rookie year, Faulk had over 700 yards, and Jackson over 600. That’s 1300 yards by committee. In 2005, Martz’ last season as head coach, Faulk had 292, Jackson 1046. That’s also 1300 yards. You’re right, he had Jackson and Faulk on the team and he used them.

I also never intimated Martz was forced to throw in St. Louis. Kevin Jones had 1,000 yards in 2004 because he was everything they had. 1,000 yards is decent in this league, not outstanding. The Lions had Joey Harrington until 2006, so my argument is they were forced to run the ball until Martz and Kitna were there.

You are misquoting me, somehow. I never said Martz was held back, I was saying he made use of what he had with his “bookend” receivers, who were not the players people normally associate with Martz. In 2006, Furrey had 1,000 yards while Roy Williams had 1,300. In 2007 the Lions receivers tallied, respectively, McDonald: 943, Williams: 838, Johnson: 756, Furrey: 664. He was not a slave to his system. He did adapt, making use of a different type of personnel.

You’re right, Martz didn’t really do anything magical with Kitna. He simply knows how to make quarterbacks successful. The fact is that Kitna never would have gone to Detroit if Martz wasn’t there, because he knows what the coach does for quarterbacks. The magic Martz worked was make Detroit a whole lot more of a contender than they would have been without him.

Kurt Warner fell apart because he got injured and Bulger came in. He did just as well, and why not keep him in, because Warner was pretty old by typical quarterback standards. If the talent level with Bulger was so much better, how did they win the Super Bowl in 1999 and not later? The talent argument is very debatable.

I didn’t rewrite history. The numbers back me up.

Comment by indianajim

As usual, you are right on the money. My only regret is that the 49ers didn’t fire Nolan and make Martz the head coach. Otherwise, Martz will in all likelihood resurrect the offense, the Niners will experience great success and Martz will be offered a head coaching job. Voila, five offensive coordinators in 5 years! Martz is a truly rare talent, unlike Nolan, and probably irreplaceable. Oh well, enjoy this year and let the chips fall wherever.

Comment by MajorNinerFan

Thank you very much, Jim! Of all the individual writers on “the Dise,” you write the most grammatical, thoughtful, and well-reasoned essays. That was a well-reasoned reply to Steve’s comment, too. Bravo! Here’s hoping for improvement in the three woeful groups on offense, which will lead to increased efficiency from the non-woeful Running Back group, Gore and Foster and Robinson, which will help the Defense, which will propel us into the playoffs.

Comment by HonoluluLes

Thanks guys, I really appreciate the kind words.

MajorNinerFan, I think Martz really displayed an almost Norv-like inability to manage an entire football team. Norv seems to finally be proving us wrong, but we’ll see how things go this season. I prefer for Martz to remain behind the offense and practice his mad scientist ways within the confines of what he does best.

Mike Nolan is a much more balanced, more reasonable person than Martz. Nolan has a better grasp on how to relate to everyone within the organization and the media. Nolan is better at being a head coach than Martz. Now, if Nolan is a bad head coach, then Martz is worse.

Thanks, HonoluluLes. That’s high praise! I just try to have professional standards.

Comment by indianajim

Steve – Have you seen ANY of the Lions games this past year? Martz said it himself, he would run the ball if he could. The fact of the matter is/was, his team was trailing, and thus, HAD to pass. Simple football math. Down by 21 points in the fourth, go deep.

MajorNinerFan – Nolan is a great coach, you just can’t see it due to this past season. Since he’s been here, he’s gotten rid of all the mistakes from the past two HC’s, got us a defense who can stop anything when they get some time to rest, and quality players both on and off the field. While I do agree with you that Martz will end up being our next HC, I don’t think it should happen. Blame Norv Turner for last year, not Nolan.

As for Alex Smith, give the poor guy some credit. How difficult is it to work for three different people in the same amount of years? Watch the kid. He has hints of Steve Young in there. Now if we could just get an offensive line who could PASS BLOCK as opposed to only run block, we’d be good enough to go all the way.

I say playoffs.

Comment by Mason




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>