Filed under: 2008 Offseason, Editorial | Tags: 2007 49ers, alex smith sucks, jim hostler sucks
Now that the season is over, the Offensive Coordinator position is nailed down, and the calm before the storm of the offseason is upon us, it’s time to look back at 2007. In this case, these entries will focus on what went wrong with 2007, as it has become one of the worst in recent memory and in team history. First in this series is analysis of the single largest contributor to the failure of 2007, the offensive coordinator.
To be fair, it’s not as though something that Jim Hostler did was the primary contributor, but rather what he could not do. It’s more about what Norv Turner did, and what Mike Nolan did in response, that started this whole avalanche. Norv left the team very late in the offseason, for a ready-made playoff team and a lot more money, leaving Mike Nolan scrambling to find his replacement. This put the entire team in the lurch, and I would like to throw a flag on Norv Turner for being the guy that started it all.
Next in line comes Mike Nolan, the guy who had to do the hiring. No one knows more about Mike Nolan’s offensive ineptitude than Mike Nolan. No one knows less about what makes a good offensive coordinator than Mike Nolan. So it should come as no surprise that, considering the amount invested in Alex Smith, that he would go with the kid’s QB coach to “keep the continuity.” The only problem is, he failed to take into account Jim Hostler’s relative experience in football.
He started out playing for Division II IUP, a satellite campus of Indiana University based in Pennsyvlania. You can’t get much further from the plane of major college experience–and Jim Hostler played defensive back. Right off the bat, this suggests that he is not familiar with what it takes to excel at the highest level, especially at any offensive position. So after graduation, Jim Hostler and his teammate Frank Cignetti coached at IUP.
Immediately following this experience, Hostler found himself in the NFL as an Offensive Quality Control coach with Kansas City (00), same position at New Orleans (01), then Assistant Wide Receivers Coach (02). At this point I’m trying to figure out what these jobs are, exactly, besides holding a clipboard for someone. He then served as QB coach for the New York Jets (03), where he had a tenuous relationship with Chad Pennington, and was then moved to Wide Receivers coach (04). In 05 he came to San Francisco, and was Alex Smith’s QB coach under Mike McCarthy and Norv Turner.
Somewhere in here is the large flashing indicator that says Jim Hostler was a good hire at Offensive Coordinator–I must simply fail to see it. After all, Nolan had Jerry Sullivan on his staff, who called served as Offensive Coordinator with the Arizona Cardinals under Dave McGinnis. Pete Hoener, the current Tight Ends Coach, had extensive experience both in the NFL and at the NCAA Division I level, and was also on staff with Jerry Sullivan. Both men, old enough to have coached Jim Hostler in his college days, were passed over for “continuity.”
Jim Hostler had neither experience, nor quantifiable success at any level in the NFL, certainly not enough to warrant the position of Offensive Coordinator with any NFL team. His first decision was far-reaching, if not arrogant. He decided to operate a mixture of Norv Turner’s digit system and Mike McCarthy’s west coast system. One thing you don’t do as a rookie coordinator is start mixing systems you have no experience calling plays for in the first place. Of course, we can only assume he did so because he claimed he did. However, strange and ancient plays that no one has ever heard of, such as “THE QUICK SLANT” were notoriously absent from any gameplan.
Throughout the season, Jim Hostler called the wrong play in the wrong situation, time and time again. Quick outs on 3rd and long, deep posts on 2nd and 2, and the infamous delay draw on 3rd and 7. In fact nothing shows how poor Hostler was at his job than the variety in the running game that didn’t exist during the first 12 weeks of the season. The only plays in Hostlers arsenal, apparently, was dive left, dive right, and the delay draw. Fans screamed repeatedly for a sweep, trap, or off-tackle play just to end the monotony.
Hostler was also known to panic, as evidenced by what he did when a play didn’t work. Take Vernon Davis’ post pattern against New York to open the second half. Yeah, Davis had his hands on it and he dropped it. But you know what? The line gave Dilfer time, Dilfer actually made a good throw, and Davis had nothing but daylight had he caught it. Did they milk the run and then try it again? No. In fact, no one ran a deep post for the rest of the game, even when they were forced to throw. Just as bad, Frank Gore averaged 6.3 yards per carry in the game, and it was still close going into the 3rd quarter. As we saw this Sunday when the Cowboys went away from the run and ended up losing, the Niners kept trying to force the pass against the best pass rush in the league and lost.
I think the biggest indicator as to Hostler’s ineptitude, as well as his self-serving attitude, was the addition of Ted Tollner. After Nolan brought him in to assist him, Hostler routinely downplayed Tollner’s role. In fact, to hear Hostler tell it in radio interviews, Ted really didn’t do much. He was just an “extra pair of eyes.” Is this why Ted Tollner was retained under Mike Martz? Because he didn’t do anything? No. In fact, we saw a marked improvement in the players and the playcalling from the first game Tollner was present. In fact, the 8-game losing streak was broken in the game at Arizona, and the 49ers more than doubled their average point output. No one can tell me Ted Tollner had no effect.
Ultimately no system can make or break a player, but rather how that system is taught. Hostler and Cignetti were incapable of moving Smith further along the track that Norv Turner started him on. In a single season he brought Alex to the cusp of being a quality starter, but how much time during the offseason and practice did they take to learn it? Conversely, how much time during the offseason and practice did Hostler take to continue drilling it into players’ heads? Amazingly, he admitted on KNBR that he did not make the players repeat plays until they got them right. How very un-Walsh of him.
The fact is that Jim Hostler deserved to be fired, just as much as he did not deserve to be hired in the first place. If you have any doubts, look at his college buddy Frank Cignetti. He has been hired to be the Offensive Coordinator at Cal. Jim Hostler remains unemployed.
12 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Here’s another thing about Hostler. He was once asked what happens if the team makes a mistake on a play in practice. Did they run it again? He said no, because the defense knew what was coming. On the other hand, Walsh would have stopped practice and made the offense do it over again and again and again. Mike Holmgren has the same philosophy in Seattle.
Comment by fquan59 January 14, 2008 @ 8:37 pmI mentioned that in the next to last paragraph, but it bears repeating. Hostler didn’t drill anything into his players. I think he was a half-(youknowwhat) coach.
Comment by indianajim January 14, 2008 @ 8:42 pmThe interesting thing about the Jim Hostler saga was how he and Mike Nolan are so similar. Think about it. Both guys have somewhat sure and confident tone despite the realities facing them. Both appear to be take charge guys, somewhat arrogant when responding to questions about questionable practice drills. Hostler was praised for how he scripted his own offensive game plans, much like a younger Mike Nolan preparing his defensive game plans. Both guys kept repeating the same mantra – execution, reviewing what went wrong, coaches need to prepare. Yet, Jim Hostler could not communicate what he wanted to his players. Mike Nolan went a foul communicating with his prized QB. Both guys squandered the talent they had on schemes they wanted to implement. Remember Hostler’s eye for running an undersized Frank Gore in between tackle. Mike Nolan still holds to the 3-4 defensive despite the talent on the field. Both guys have shown an ability to misjudge talent.
The one redeeming difference for Nolan may be that he can admit a mistake and take radical actions afterwards. May be after seeing too much similarities, he went far out from his norm and comfort zone. How else can explain hiring Mike Martz!
Comment by EastCostNiner January 14, 2008 @ 9:15 pmGreat comment. I think you’re right to a certain extent, but I also think he was trying to emulate Nolan a little bit.
Ultimately I believe Nolan’s decision regarding Mike Martz came down to picking the best available. It wasn’t to thumb the nose at Scot McLoughan, because he told McCloughan he thought Martz would be unavailable. I don’t think it was to go with the polar opposite from himself.
Mike Martz has the track record for success, he’s coached three NFL MVP’s in the last decade, and has produced two Super Bowl appearances with one win. He was the best-qualified coordinator in this offseason, just like Norv was the best-qualified coordinator going into ‘06. I mean, to think Nolan has hired two of the best Offensive Coordinators in league history in his four years is stunning.
Comment by indianajim January 14, 2008 @ 9:36 pmIn retrospect it is easy to call out Nolan for making such a dumb choice. But I recall no less a critic than Glenn Dickey writing to the effect that if the 49ers were going to hire in-house, that Hostler would be the best choice.
Comment by sitkaniner January 15, 2008 @ 12:38 amWell all these calls are made in retrospect, but I think Nolan could have had an inkling. The fact is almost EVERYBODY thought it was the best choice, given the circumstances, and Hostler had every chance to know what he was doing, he apparently already thought he did.
Comment by indianajim January 15, 2008 @ 1:20 amI largely agree with the article. But just one thing about the playcalling. Yes, it looked poor, and at some times was painfully negative. But if 2nd and 2 is not a good down to call a deep post then what is? When will you have a better chance to pull it off? I think that THAT indivdual playcall should be applauded. And while quick outs on 3rd and long are awful (and far too common throughout the NFL), a draw on 3rd and 7 doesnt seem to me to be a bad call, with protection being as poor as it was, and the passing game being woeful. If the deep out and the draw had worked, we might be applauding inspired playcalling…on those plays at least.
Comment by Adrian Wood January 15, 2008 @ 12:11 pmIf your argument is “because that’s the last thing the defense will expect,” then I have a double-reverse on 3rd and 8 for a loss of nine against the Rams I want to sell you.
Fortunately we have the benefit of seeing the results of his playcalling. LAST IN THE LEAGUE.
Comment by indianajim January 15, 2008 @ 12:40 pmI AM A LONG TIME 49ER FAN LIVIVG IN N.E. OHIO IT HURTS VERY BAD THAT OUR TEAM HAS TURNED INTO ONE OF THE NFL LAUGHING STOCKS IN THE NFL IAM GETTING ALOT OF SHIT FOR MY TEAM I LOVE THEM. CAN ANY ONE IN OHIO KNOW WHAT IAM GOING THROUGH WRITE BACK . MAYBE WE MAY BE 500 NEXT YEAR. WE COUNT BEAT THE SHITLY ASS BROWNS THATS SICK. MAY EMAIL IS NINERS45 @YAHOO.COM GO NINERS I LOVE YOU
Comment by BRIAN MORRIS January 15, 2008 @ 3:13 pmCool, thanks for your post. I’m living in Indiana, so a lot of people here don’t really care about the 49ers at all.
Whoever Mike Martz picks as his starter will put up great numbers next year. Happens everywhere he goes. With our defense as good as it is (and getting better with Manny Lawson back!), and with Martz’ track record of making offenses great, we will win the division and be in the playoffs next year.
With Jim Hostler at the helm that was a sort of optimistic hope. With Martz at the helm, there is no doubt in my mind. Whether it’s a 9-7 title or a 12-4 title, don’t know that yet. But we’ll win the division.
Comment by indianajim January 15, 2008 @ 3:26 pmJust face it…the 49ers and Nolan got Hostler for 500K/yr….you get what you pay for…..look at other OC salaries….what is Martz making?
Comment by Big Poppa January 15, 2008 @ 4:52 pmYeah, exactly. Martz is being paid more than in Detroit, but the proof is in the pudding. Look at how long it’s taking for Hostler to land a job. Being last will do that to you.
Comment by indianajim January 15, 2008 @ 5:37 pm